Oct 122012
 

I’ve been watching in horror over recent months as people are fined and jailed because they’ve made an offensive comment or joke online.

This is a worrying direction in which we are heading. Freedom of speech should be protected at all costs. I decided I would write to my MP expressing my worry and asking if this subject could be raised. I think you should do the same. If I get a response I will update this post or make a new one.

Dear Iain Stewart,

I hope this e-mail finds you well.

I am writing in response to the recent spate of heavy handed sentencing in regards to statements and jokes made on social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter.

I hoped that the overturning of Paul Chambers’ conviction in the ‘Twitter Joke Trial’ would set a precedent in regards to to this subject but instead it seems that judges are continuing to hand out sentences that are grossly out of proportion with the supposed crime as a knee jerk reaction. Sentencing should not be affected by ‘public outrage’.

For example, I refer you to the recent case of Matthew Woods whereby a tasteless and insensitive joke has landed the 19 year old a custodial sentence. This sets a dangerous precedent. Should we really be legislating against bad taste humour? Who decides when the line has has been overstepped?

I also refer you to the recent sentencing of Azhar Ahmed. A young man who expressed an unpopular opinion regarding several dead British soldiers on Facebook. A comment on a website has got him a fine, 240 hours community service and a criminal record. Would the sentence be as tough had the soldiers been foreign nationals and the defendant white?

I can quote several other similar cases from the past year if required.

I am not defending the view points of these people. I am, however, defending the right to express a view that others may dislike or be offended by. Surely you agree that free speech should be a basic right of any British citizen? On a related point, is this seriously an appropriate use of police time in this era of austerity?

As my member of parliament I would greatly appreciate it if you could discuss this subject with fellow MPs and raise the debate in the house of commons.

Thank you for taking the time to read this e-mail.

Yours sincerely,

Louis Houghton

Jul 252012
 

Last night I finished reading Carl Sagan‘s book Pale Blue Dot. It’s almost 20 years old now so it’s not exactly the best book to read for up to date details on the subject of astronomy or space travel but I wanted to read it after stumbling across an extract from it a few years ago. In the passage in question, Sagan describes his feeling when looking at a picture of the Earth taken by the Voyager 1 spacecraft from the edge of the solar system. I suggest reading it. It’s really quite beautiful.

I couldn’t help feeling slightly depressed once I had finished the book. Of the predicted advancements covered in the book we have achieved very few (the International Space Station being the main exception). We are no closer to visiting asteroids or Mars than in 1994. In fact it could be argued that we’re further away considering the US doesn’t even have the means to put a man into space now that the shuttle has been retired.

What is really shocking about reading the book is how little we’ve come on politically and environmentally. Sagan described how in the future (in terms of 1994) global stability would help us work together as one planet to achieve goals such as settling Mars. 20 years on however and we’re still spending vast amounts of money blowing up people in the middle east instead of funding space programs.

We also still seem set on destroying our clement climate through pollution. Promises made in Kyoto are being broken and politicians continue to ignore the impending doom that awaits us on this path in favour of short term gains in popularity. People complain about wind farms (both on and offshore), tidal power and nuclear power when these are the only hopes we have. In the nearly 20 years since Sagan wrote Pale Blue Dot and discussed the impact we are having on the Earth we’ve only gotten worse.

Sagan describes how we must eventually become space faring to survive as a species. Human colonies on other worlds are insulated against extinctions on Earth. It seems to me though that we are working ourselves into a corner. Governments seem intent on destroying the planet but refuse to fund our only escape route – space exploration.

 

May 032012
 

So the local elections are upon us and with them come the first time I have to actually choose a party to vote for. Previously I would have voted Lib Dem but since forming the coalition and going back on several key election promises I’ve lost all faith in them. I know local politics are fairly separate from state politics but the association is there and I’d like to show Cleggy how pissed off I am at him.

So this leaves me with the choice between the other lefty parties – Labour and the Greens. I reckon I probably will vote Labour when the next general election rolls round because it’ll be the only way to oust the Tories but in the local elections I feel I have a bit more choice.

I’m seriously thinking about voting Green. I support a lot of what the Green party stands for in regards to the environment but I’ve never voted for them before. Partly because it was always seen as a wasted vote but also because I fundamentally disagree with their stance on subjects concerning science. Today I saw this Reddit post in which someone with exactly my thoughts voted Green but then e-mailed the party to explain their stance. In the e-mail they write that whilst they agree with many of the Green’s policies, the party’s stance on nuclear power and GM crops for example is ‘naive and dangerous’.

This sums up my thoughts exactly and I’m leaning towards doing the same thing.

On a side note I thought I better add how disappointed I am with the amount of information available on the people we’re voting for here in Milton Keynes. All we get on the council website is a list of names next to the parties. I have no idea what these people stand for. I tweeted the @MKCouncil twitter account to find out if any of the candidates blogged or used Twitter but 5 hours later I’ve not heard anything. Googling their names doesn’t bring up anything interesting either.

It just means that people end up voting based on their ideological views of each party as opposed to proper policies. For all I know the Green candidate is opposed to a load of stuff I support. Maybe the Tory candidate and I have very similar views (I doubt it somehow). There’s no way to tell because there seems to be nothing about these people online.

Anyway, hopefully the rain will hold off long enough to walk down to the polling station.

Nov 132010
 

Of all the things I’ve read in the news this year there is one thing that has frightened me the most. Forget about the usual scare stories about the imminent destruction of the human race or the threat of attack from terrorists. The most worrying thing is clearly the loss of Paul Chambers’ appeal in the so called Twitter Joke Trial.

The first time Chambers was found guilty of sending threatening messages to Robin Hood airport over Twitter I thought it was ridiculous enough. Obviously he said he would appeal and most sane people assumed this madness would be overturned once the case was heard by people that weren’t idiots. Of course this being the current British legal system that was too much to hope for and Paul Chambers’ appeal has failed. He has been ordered to pay a fine (although Stephen Fry has offered to pay these like the gentleman he is) and because of the whole mess has lost his job.

The reason this scares me so is because it sets a legal precedent that disallows us from making jokes and being facetious on the internet. If I say that I would like to punch Jedward in their collective faces will I be arrested from threatening behaviour? Does the fact that I haven’t punched someone since I was 10 or that I am clearly exaggerating for comic effect have no meaning? Internet forums and message boards are filled with people making morally dubious statements that are clearly not to be taken seriously. Until Chambers’ conviction no one thought that anyone would actually take these statements seriously but now we have to consider the fact that they might.

I’m hoping that the mainstream media will take a little more notice of this case after this failed appeal. It seems to me that this could have a detrimental effect on their freedom of speech. If you’ve ever read Charlie Brooker’s columns in the Guardian you’d know that he routinely threatens celebrities and people in the news in a light hearted fashion.

The IAmSpartacus hashtag (where people tweeted Chambers’ offending tweet verbatim) trended on Twitter for most of yesterday. The hope is that this will highlight the ridiculousness of the situation… either that or a few thousand of us Twitter users are in for a rather large fine.

People like me that have grown up with the web and specifically textual communication are overtly aware that subtle meaning can be lost in transmission. Sarcastic comments are taken seriously all over the web but this has taken that phenomenon to the next level. My only solution to this problem is to finish any jokey sentence that could be misconstrued with the universal sign of ‘only kidding’ – :-P

edit.  Corrected spelling of Spartacus… how embarrassing.

Sep 072010
 

I’ve been meaning to write a quite rebuttal to this piece by David Dietle on cracked.com I found a few weeks ago. The article is entitled 7 Scientifc Reasons a Zombie Outbreak Would Fail Quickly and it attempts to look more realistically at the idea of a zombie outbreak. Now I know the idea of using scientific ideas to debunk a purely fantastical  doomsday scenario is a bit silly and me taking the time to write a counter piece is even more silly but I thought it would get me in the mood for the upcoming Walking Dead TV adaptation (very very excited).

7. They have too many natural predators.

I’m not sure where Dietle thinks the majority of the human race live but there aren’t that many large natural predators around here. You could probably walk the length of the UK without being hassled by a dangerous animal that could and would seriously harm you. Even in the US most of the population live in towns where wild animals are scarce.

6. They can’t take the heat.

Again, when looking at the UK (and even parts of the US) we rarely get extended periods of hot weather. Even then Dietle suggests it would take a few weeks before zombies became too decomposed to pose a threat and whilst decomposition will be high on your average zombie’s worry list, s/he doesn’t need that long to infect others. In fact when we look at the vast array of zombie films we see that zombies are most dangerous just after they turn. Families are still in grief and are not ready to kill their recently risen relation or, if we are thinking about the early stages of the outbreak, the survivor will be unaware of the zombie’s dangerous habits.

Dietle describes the rather gruesome scenario whereby the gases trapped inside the walking dead build up in hot weather and eventually burst the zombie like a ‘rancid meat balloon’. Is it just me or does this sound like a fairly effective way to infect a large area with zombie blood? In fact, that sounds a little similar to the Boomers in Left  4 Dead 2. And lets not forget that even with a gaping wound in their abdomen a zombie will happily drag itself towards you for a bit of ankle biting.

5. They can’t handle the cold.

This I can’t argue with. Max Brooks describes in World War Z how survivors venture north as the zombies are frozen in artic climates. But again, this hardly accounts for most of the world’s population and even the cold areas thaw out in summer.

4. Biting is a terrible way to spread a disease.

Yes, the victim has to be in biting distance of the zombie but is that really hard to imagine? Shaun of the Dead shows us how zombies can easily be mistaken for the hopeless insane in the early stages. A person could be biten on the way home and turn later that night in the bosom of the family.

Even in the later stages we see in films such as Land of the Dead that armed soldiers can be taken unaware when looting shops. A zombie hiding in a dark stock cupboard could get a lucky shot.

3. They can’t heal from day to day damage.

Dietle highlights that zombies cannot heal from injuries sustained from day to day ‘life’. He argues that after a relatively short period of time (the length of all series of 24) all zombies will be rendered harmless due to falling from cliffs, bridges or buildings and breaking bones and teeth.

Whilst zombies do have a habit of receiving the odd gash or head wound they are incredibly hardy. Dr. Logan in Day of the Dead completely removes a zombie’s internal organs and it still wants to attack. As mentioned earlier a zombie is happy to pull itself across the floor with one arm and no legs to get a sneaky ankle bite. How many times have you been killed by that one zombie torso you missed in Resident Evil?

2. The landscape is full of zombie proof features.

Again, I think this is referring more to America but even then I doubt most towns are filled with cliffs, mountains and bridges. Densely populated cities aren’t filled with that many hazards except cars (and even then roads would clog up quickly) so zombies wouldn’t be falling off too many objects.

Cities also offer the zombie perpetual light so it won’t be walking into too many rivers (even if it did it could walk to the other side or resurface elsewhere). Even after the power supply is cut off pockets of survivors will undoubtedly use candles of portable generators to create light and this will provide a beacon for the horde.

Dietle argues we could all hide in high-rise buildings but there aren’t that many office blocks that are stocked out with food and medical supplies for a few months or years. Even if you don’t accidentally let in a carrier that has not yet turned, you’ll eventually have to venture out for food.

1. Weapons and the people who use them.

There’s no doubt that America is filled with guns. They would have a nice advantage over us in this department but it doesn’t help in the initial outbreak where people would have to be prepared to re-kill loved ones and even children.

Even later in the conflict zombies aren’t easy targets. Head-shots are much harder to get than than chest hits. Especially when we’re thinking about hundreds or thousands of zombies coming towards you at once.Even after a bombing raid there may be somebeaten up but still dangerous zombie fragments around.

Battle of Yonkers by John Peterson

In World War Z we see the army fail miserably at the Battle of Yonkers due to being unprepared and outnumbered. Your average military tactics aren’t always effective against such a alien enemy.

Aug 142010
 

If not, I hope you have a spare few thousand pounds knocking around because otherwise you might have to make some pretty difficult decisions.

Last week we picked our kitten Sailor up from The Royal Veternary College. If you’ve not read anything about our worries with him, he basically had massive kidney failure that forced him to spend a week being treated by specialists. Luckily he made it home and he seems to be back to his normal self. But this was of course incredibly expensive.

The total bill ended up being in the region of £2500. This is actually less than originally thought but it’s still a pretty huge sum of money for most people. The best thing about it was that we never had to make a financial decision  about whether we could afford his treatment. When our vet asked if they could perform tests that would cost around £300 we could just say yes. When they said his only chance of survival was to take him to a specialist that could cost over £4000 we just picked him up and took him straight there. This is because the first thing we did when we got him was to take out pet insurance.

We pay around £7 a month for him (although I’m sure it’ll go up next year after this claim) which is a pretty tiny amount of money. I know insurance companies can be evil. Many will do all they can to not pay out but we have never had this problem with Sainsbury’s. They paid out straight away for Fritz (our other cat) when we had to stay in the vets with a blocked bladder (that claim was around £600) and they have already sent a check to our local vets for the care he received there.

I don’t want this post to be preachy but I would just like to make people think about their situation as I have many friends with pets that I know would be heartbroken if they had to be put down due to lack of money. Of course you my be lucky and your pet won’t get ill throughout their whole life but what if they did?

You might end up paying much more in insurance over the course of their life but unless you can rustle up a few thousand pounds in a couple of days it’s much easier to just pay less than £10 a month for the piece of mind.

It’s just something to think about.

Apr 252010
 

I don’t usually bother with writing about politics as my views tend to lean towards the wooly liberal side of things so everything I would say will have been said hundreds of times before by people much more intelligent and articulate than me. For the 7 years I have been able to vote I have also been seen to be throw away my vote on a party with no hope of really gaining any meaningful power in parliament.

Over the past couple of weeks things seem to have changed somewhat. Instead of backing the lame horse destined to receive a shotgun blast to the face I am backing a party with a real chance of actually gaining some pretty decent seats. I still think it’s doubtful that old Nick Clegg will become Prime Minister after the election (I’m sure most people that say they are voting Lib Dem will chicken out on the day) but there is a chance, no matter how small, and it’s a novel feeling for me.

So why am I voting for the Lib Dems on May 6th?

Before I go into specific policies I think it’s fair to say that the left wing, liberal voters really have no other choice. You could vote Green but that really is a wasted vote. I don’t really have to explain why I would never vote Conservative. Even if you ignore their awful, sub-human leader their policies on the military, immigration, taxation and almost everything else fly in the face of my own beliefs. Sadly this is also the case with Labour on the majority of subjects. Since 11/9 (the correct date format for 9/11) we have seen Labour erode our own personal rights and freedoms, take us in to two wars and become the pawn of large corporations lobbying for their own self interests. This is not a government I can support even if it is to block the Tories. This just leaves us with the Lib Dems.

I wont go into too much depth here as I don’t really want another 1000 word post and after too long I’ll only end up highlighting my own ignorance on many subjects.

Firstly I am ecstatic to hear a party talk seriously about nuclear disarmament. In this world of suicide bombers and improvised explosive devices I don’t see nukes as a viable deterrent. Why is someone going to be worried about retaliation when they don’t care about their own life. But ‘we aren’t talking about that kind of threat’ I here you say. Well I believe the threat of nuclear attack from Iran or North Korea is hugely exaggerated and anyway, North Korea has bigger (and closer) enemies than us. Even if these countries did want to nuke us they don’t have the modern missile technology we and the US possess. These nukes are large things. Too big to fit on a relatively primitive missile so the chance of it not being shot down on the fairly long journey to us is remote. So… I don’t really think Trident is a valuable investment for our country. Especially when other areas need those billions much more urgently.

I am also very supportive of the Lib Dems plan to raise the tax allowance. This will of course benefit me but that isn’t the main reason I like this idea. A lot of people earn less than you think. In my time working as a television, post production runner I was earning minimum wage. I was also living in London having to pay tube travel and extortionate food and booze prices. It isn’t just the TV industry that has entry level staff in this situation. Most creative industries rely on paying their runners/assistants pitiful wages. Usually these are really intelligent and educated people having to scrape by. I know a lot of other people that work really hard for little money so this would be a great help for almost everyone I know as well as some of the country’s most needy people.

Finally the Lib Dems are the only party that at least partially opposed the Digital Economy Bill. Nick Clegg has promised to repeal the bill is they gain power. I’m not sure how much of a publicity stunt this is but if they go through with it it can only be a good thing. This isn’t because I want to illegally download hundreds of MP3s. I don’t. In fact I only thing I torrent these days is television and that’s only when I can’t get a hold of it through legitimate means such as iPlayer or 4od – Dexter tends to be shown almost a year later on British TV. I’m more opposed to the infamous ‘three strikes’ clause and the part which means we could see Youtube, and in fact almost every web 2.0 site, blocked due to hosting or having the intention to host copy righted material.

So these are just a few reasons why I’ll be voting for the Liberal Democrats on May 6th. I really hope everyone reading this will also be voting and thinking seriously about who to vote for.